Rubin Ultra GPU vs Radeon RX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking498not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.12no data
Power efficiency10.13no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameBaffinGR110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2016 (9 years ago)2027
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89657344
Core clock speed1090 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate67.204,062.5
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs561792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cache224 KB112 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 6.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 3600 Watt

RX 460 has 4700% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 460 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 is a desktop graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1170 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 460 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.