Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs R9 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
255 OEM 260 OEM 270 270 1024SP 270X 280 280X 280X2 285 290 290X 290X2 295X2 360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2 A375 Fury FURY X FURY X2 Nano
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9050 9050 4 GB 9050 8 GB 9050 OEM 9060 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT LP

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 Nano and Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 Nano
2015, $649
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 175 Watt
20.28

9060 XT LP outperforms R9 Nano by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 Nano R9 Nano
RX 9060 XT LP RX 9060 XT LP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.81no data
Power efficiency9.0325.36
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameFijiNavi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date27 August 2015 (11 years ago)17 December 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz3050 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate256.0390.4
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS24.99 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan+1.4
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 Nano 20.28
RX 9060 XT LP 45.56
+125%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 Nano 8486
RX 9060 XT LP 19060
+125%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
−54.5%
200−210
4K46
−54%
100−110

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.13no data
4K14.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 55−60 120−130
+114%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 260−270
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+122%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 55−60 120−130
+114%
Battlefield 5 85−90 190−200
+124%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 260−270
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+122%
Far Cry 5 65−70 150−160
+121%
Fortnite 100−110 240−250
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 180−190
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 170−180
+113%
Valorant 150−160 300−310
+100%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 55−60 120−130
+114%
Battlefield 5 85−90 190−200
+124%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 260−270
+122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 500−550
+108%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+122%
Dota 2 110−120 250−260
+119%
Far Cry 5 65−70 150−160
+121%
Far Cry 6 55−60 130−140
+124%
Fortnite 100−110 240−250
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 180−190
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80 170−180
+124%
Metro Exodus 45−50 100−105
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 170−180
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 130−140
+120%
Valorant 150−160 300−310
+100%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 190−200
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 100−105
+122%
Dota 2 110−120 250−260
+119%
Far Cry 5 65−70 150−160
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 180−190
+114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 170−180
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47 100−105
+113%
Valorant 150−160 300−310
+100%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 240−250
+124%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 95−100
+121%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 300−310
+101%
Far Cry 6 30−35 70−75
+112%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 80−85
+116%
Metro Exodus 27−30 60−65
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 350−400
+102%
Valorant 170−180 350−400
+101%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 130−140
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 40−45
+100%
Far Cry 5 45−50 100−105
+113%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 110−120
+112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 70−75
+119%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 110−120
+124%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 16−18 35−40
+119%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 40−45
+111%
Far Cry 6 10−12 24−27
+118%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 85−90
+124%
Metro Exodus 16−18 35−40
+106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 75−80
+114%
Valorant 110−120 240−250
+116%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 70−75
+119%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 40−45
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 16−18
+100%
Dota 2 70−75 150−160
+114%
Far Cry 5 24−27 50−55
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 80−85
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 45−50
+114%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 45−50
+105%

This is how R9 Nano and RX 9060 XT LP compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT LP is 120% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT LP is 117% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.28 45.56
Recency 27 August 2015 17 December 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 140 Watt

RX 9060 XT LP has a 125% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 86% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Nano in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 Nano Radeon R9 Nano
vs
RX 480 Radeon RX 480
RX 9060 XT LP Radeon RX 9060 XT LP
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
R9 Nano Radeon R9 Nano
vs
GTX TITAN GeForce GTX TITAN
R9 Fury R9 Fury
vs
RX 580X RX 580X
R9 Fury R9 Fury
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
R9 Fury R9 Fury
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
R9 Nano R9 Nano
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
R9 Nano R9 Nano
vs
R9 390X2 R9 390X2
GTX 980 GTX 980
vs
Quadro M620 M620
GTX 980 GTX 980
vs
8400M G 8400M G
GTX 980 GTX 980
vs
R9 370 R9 370
GTX 980 GTX 980
vs
FirePro S7150 S7150
GTX 980 GTX 980
vs
FirePro W8100 W8100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 101 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Nano or Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.