Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Radeon R9 M380
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 M380 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms R9 M380 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 621 | 475 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | no data |
| GPU code name | Strato | Panther Lake |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 (11 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,080 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.536 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 48 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | no data |
| Mantle | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18−20
−72.2%
| 31
+72.2%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−139%
|
79
+139%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−76.9%
|
21−24
+76.9%
|
| Palworld | 16−18
−62.5%
|
24−27
+62.5%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−12
−100%
|
21−24
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−69%
|
45−50
+69%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−78.8%
|
59
+78.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−76.9%
|
21−24
+76.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−71.4%
|
35−40
+71.4%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
−65%
|
65−70
+65%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
−60%
|
45−50
+60%
|
| Palworld | 16−18
−62.5%
|
24−27
+62.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−66.7%
|
40−45
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−38.4%
|
100−110
+38.4%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−69%
|
45−50
+69%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+22.2%
|
27
−22.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
−48.6%
|
160−170
+48.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−76.9%
|
21−24
+76.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−60.4%
|
85−90
+60.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−71.4%
|
35−40
+71.4%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
−65%
|
65−70
+65%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
−60%
|
45−50
+60%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−60.9%
|
37
+60.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
−76.9%
|
21−24
+76.9%
|
| Palworld | 16−18
−62.5%
|
24−27
+62.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−66.7%
|
40−45
+66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−61.1%
|
27−30
+61.1%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−38.4%
|
100−110
+38.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−69%
|
45−50
+69%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−76.9%
|
21−24
+76.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−60.4%
|
85−90
+60.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−71.4%
|
35−40
+71.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
−60%
|
45−50
+60%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−66.7%
|
40−45
+66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−61.1%
|
27−30
+61.1%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−64.4%
|
120−130
+64.4%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
−65%
|
65−70
+65%
|
| Palworld | 16−18
−62.5%
|
24−27
+62.5%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−75%
|
21−24
+75%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
−64.7%
|
80−85
+64.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
−62.5%
|
65−70
+62.5%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
−63.2%
|
110−120
+63.2%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−142%
|
27−30
+142%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−68.8%
|
27−30
+68.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
−84.6%
|
24−27
+84.6%
|
| Palworld | 9−10
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−29.4%
|
21−24
+29.4%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Palworld | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−75.9%
|
50−55
+75.9%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−150%
|
14−16
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
−45.8%
|
35−40
+45.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Palworld | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
This is how R9 M380 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 72% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M380 is 22% faster.
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R9 M380 performs better in 1 test (2%)
- Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 56 tests (98%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.62 | 11.03 |
| Recency | 5 May 2015 | 5 January 2026 |
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 67% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 years.
The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
