RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell vs Radeon R9 M295X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.82no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAmethystGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)18 March 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204824064
Core clock speed723 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate92.541,968.0
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs128752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cache512 KB23.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount0 MB96 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.4
Mantle+-
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 600 Watt

R9 M295X has 140% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X and RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 19 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 20 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X or RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.