UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon R9 M275X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8860 HD 8830M HD 8850M HD 8870M R9 M265X R9 M270X R9 M275 R9 M275X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 32EU Mobile G4 G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) G4 48EU Mobile G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) G7 64EU Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M275X and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M275X
2014
4 GB GDDR5
3.66
+27.5%

R9 M275X outperforms Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M275X R9 M275X
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking777837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.88
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVenusIce Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 January 2014 (12 years ago)28 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate37.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
+23.1%
13
−23.1%
4K10−12
+11.1%
9
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+0%
4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 2
+0%
2
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Palworld 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R9 M275X and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • R9 M275X is 23% faster in 1080p
  • R9 M275X is 11% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.66 2.87
Recency 28 January 2014 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

R9 M275X has a 28% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M275X is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
R9 M275X Radeon R9 M275X
vs
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
R7 M260DX M260DX
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
Tegra 2
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
ATI 3000 IGP 3000 IGP
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
Xbox XGPU-S S
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 685 685
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
8400 SE 8400 SE
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
CMP 30HX 30HX
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile G7 64EU Mobile
R9 M275X AMD R9 M275X
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 4070 Ti SUPER

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M275X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 406 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M275X or UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.