GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Radeon R9 Fury

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
255 OEM 260 OEM 270 270 1024SP 270X 280 280X 280X2 285 290 290X 290X2 295X2 360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2 A375 Fury FURY X FURY X2 Nano
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3050 A Mobile 3050 Max-Q 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile 3050 Mobile Refresh 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Ti Max-Q 3050 Ti Mobile 3060 Max-Q 3060 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 Fury with GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 Fury
2015, $549
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
22.70
RTX 3050 A Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
25.51
+12.4%

RTX 3050 A Mobile outperforms R9 Fury by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 Fury R9 Fury
RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking285262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.01no data
Power efficiency6.4444.22
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameFijiGA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 July 2015 (11 years ago)2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841792
Compute units56no data
Core clock speedno data1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1343 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate224.075.21
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs22456
Tensor Coresno data56
Ray Tracing Coresno data14
L1 Cache896 KB1.8 MB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 Fury 22.70
RTX 3050 A Mobile 25.51
+12.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 Fury 9516
Samples: 457
RTX 3050 A Mobile 10693
+12.4%
Samples: 165

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
−10%
100−110
1440p106110−120
+3.8%
4K4850−55
+4.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.10no data
1440p5.18no data
4K11.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 140−150
+6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 55−60
+10%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 50−55
+6.4%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 60−65
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 100−105
+7.5%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 140−150
+6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 55−60
+10%
Far Cry 5 75−80 85−90
+11.8%
Fortnite 110−120 130−140
+12.1%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 100−105
+7.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 50−55
+6.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 100−105
+9.9%
Valorant 160−170 180−190
+11.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 100−105
+7.5%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 140−150
+6.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 268 300−310
+11.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 55−60
+10%
Dota 2 120−130 130−140
+8.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80 85−90
+11.8%
Fortnite 95 100−105
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 100−105
+7.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 90−95
+7.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 50−55
+6.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55 55−60
+7.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 100−105
+9.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91 100−105
+9.9%
Valorant 160−170 180−190
+11.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 100−105
+7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 55−60
+10%
Dota 2 130 140−150
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80 85−90
+11.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 100−105
+7.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 50−55
+6.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50 55−60
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 50−55
+8.7%
Valorant 160−170 180−190
+11.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 72 80−85
+11.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 55−60
+10%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 158 170−180
+7.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 45−50
+7.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+9.2%
Valorant 180−190 210−220
+11.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 70−75
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55 55−60
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 65−70
+10.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 27−30
+3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 40−45
+8.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 60−65
+7.1%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 24−27
+4.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 109 120−130
+10.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 47 50−55
+6.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 16−18
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 20−22 21−24
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 40−45
+11.1%
Valorant 120−130 140−150
+9.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 40−45
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 10−11
Dota 2 102 110−120
+7.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30 30−33
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 45−50
+9.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20 21−24
+5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 25 27−30
+8%

This is how R9 Fury and RTX 3050 A Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 11% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 4% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.70 25.51
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 3050 A Mobile has a 12% higher aggregate performance score, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 84% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Fury in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Fury is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 Fury Radeon R9 Fury
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
RTX 3050 A Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
R9 Fury Radeon R9 Fury
vs
GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 780 Ti
R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
vs
R7 240 R7 240
R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
vs
RTX 2070 RTX 2070
R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile
R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
vs
RTX 5080 RTX 5080
R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
vs
RX 9050 4 GB RX 9050 4 GB
R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 Fury
vs
RX 9050 RX 9050
R9 Nano AMD Radeon R9 Nano
vs
GTX 950 GTX 950
R9 Nano AMD Radeon R9 Nano
vs
GTX 660 Ti GTX 660 Ti
R9 Nano AMD Radeon R9 Nano
vs
R7 250 R7 250

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 197 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 45 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Fury or GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.