Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 vs Radeon R9 390 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGrenadaTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 September 2015 (10 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×280
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Wattno data
Texture fill rate160.0 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs64 ×2no data
TMUs160 ×2no data
L1 Cache640 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed1350 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390 X2 is a desktop graphics card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 8 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.