GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon R9 390 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated232
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.25
Power efficiencyno data17.97
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGrenadaTU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 September 2015 (10 years ago)14 March 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399 $219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560 ×21408
Core clock speed1000 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)580 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate160.0 ×2157.1
Floating-point processing power5.12 TFLOPS ×25.027 TFLOPS
ROPs64 ×248
TMUs160 ×288
L1 Cache640 KB1.4 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors4x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB ×26 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth345.6 GB/s ×2192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2015 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 580 Watt 120 Watt

R9 390 X2 has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 383% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 390 X2 and GeForce GTX 1660. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6564 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 390 X2 or GeForce GTX 1660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.