Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 380X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380X with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, including specs and performance data.

R9 380X
2015, $229
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
14.70
+71.1%

R9 380X outperforms Graphics G7 96EUs by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 380X R9 380X
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking401550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.11no data
Power efficiency5.9923.73
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameAntiguaTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (10 years ago)15 August 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204896
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate124.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs128no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed970 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan+-
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380X 14.70
+71.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 8.59

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 380X 9510
+84.3%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5160

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+53.8%
26
−53.8%
1440p24−27
+60%
15
−60%
4K18−21
+50%
12
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.73no data
1440p9.54no data
4K12.72no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Palworld 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20
+0%
20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 124
+0%
124
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Fortnite 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 15
+0%
15
+0%
Palworld 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 112
+0%
112
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 15
+0%
15
+0%
Palworld 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8
+0%
8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Palworld 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how R9 380X and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • R9 380X is 54% faster in 1080p
  • R9 380X is 60% faster in 1440p
  • R9 380X is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.70 8.59
Recency 19 November 2015 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 28 Watt

R9 380X has a 71% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 579% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 380X is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380X is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
GTX 960 GeForce GTX 960
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
GTX 870M GeForce GTX 870M
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
RX 460 1024SP AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
vs
Arc Pro B65 Pro B65
RX 470D AMD Radeon RX 470D
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
RX 470D AMD Radeon RX 470D
vs
Data Center GPU Flex 170 Center GPU Flex 170
R7 450 OEM AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
vs
Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
R7 360E AMD Radeon R7 360E
vs
Arc Pro B60 Pro B60
R9 FURY X AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
R7 360 AMD Radeon R7 360
vs
FirePro M6100 FirePro M6100
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
RX 640 RX 640
R9 390 AMD Radeon R9 390
vs
Pro W6600 Pro W6600
R5 310 OEM AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
vs
RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile RTX 5060 3584SP Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 228 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1176 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.