GeForce MX110 vs Radeon R9 380X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 380X with GeForce MX110, including specs and performance data.

R9 380X
2015, $229
4 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
14.65
+336%

R9 380X outperforms MX110 by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking406804
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.11no data
Power efficiency6.008.72
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameAntiguaGM108S
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date19 November 2015 (10 years ago)17 November 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048256
Compute units32no data
Core clock speedno data978 MHz
Boost clock speed970 MHz1006 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,020 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate124.216.10
Floating-point processing power3.973 TFLOPS0.5151 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12816
L1 Cache512 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors​2 x 6-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed970 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth182.4 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.36.7 (5.1)
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 380X 14.65
+336%
GeForce MX110 3.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 380X 6131
+336%
Samples: 1210
GeForce MX110 1407
Samples: 1462

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 380X 9510
+455%
GeForce MX110 1714

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+317%
18

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.05no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 8−9 8−9
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 7−8
Resident Evil 4 Remake 4−5 4−5

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 8−9 8−9
Battlefield 5 14 14
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 7−8
Far Cry 5 10 10
Fortnite 30 30
Forza Horizon 4 16 16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18 18
Valorant 50−55 50−55

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 8−9 8−9
Battlefield 5 12 12
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45 45
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 7−8
Dota 2 36 36
Far Cry 5 9 9
Fortnite 15 15
Forza Horizon 4 12 12
Grand Theft Auto V 13 13
Metro Exodus 2 2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17 17
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 9
Valorant 50−55 50−55

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 7−8
Dota 2 33 33
Far Cry 5 8 8
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 16−18
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12 12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5 5
Valorant 50−55 50−55

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12 12

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 7−8
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27 24−27
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 1−2
Metro Exodus 1−2 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 27−30
Valorant 30−35 30−35

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 2−3
Far Cry 5 5−6 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 5−6

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 6−7

4K
High

Atomic Heart 2−3 2−3
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 14−16
Valorant 14−16 14−16

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 10−11 10−11
Far Cry 5 2−3 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 4−5

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 4−5

This is how R9 380X and GeForce MX110 compete in popular games:

  • R9 380X is 317% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.65 3.36
Recency 19 November 2015 17 November 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 30 Watt

R9 380X has a 336% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX110, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 84% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 380X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX110 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 380X is a desktop graphics card while GeForce MX110 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 228 votes

Rate Radeon R9 380X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 2713 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 380X or GeForce MX110, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.