GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs Radeon R9 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 290 and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 290
2013, $399
4 GB GDDR5, 275 Watt
19.34
RTX 3090 Ti
2022, $1,999
24 GB GDDR6X, 450 Watt
69.81
+261%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms R9 290 by a whopping 261% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking32619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.1117.55
Power efficiency5.4712.08
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameHawaiiGA102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 November 2013 (12 years ago)27 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 3090 Ti has 147% better value for money than R9 290.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256010752
Core clock speed947 MHz1560 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1860 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate151.5625.0
Floating-point processing power4.849 TFLOPS40 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs160336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cache640 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length275 mm336 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 290 19.34
RTX 3090 Ti 69.81
+261%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 290 8093
Samples: 800
RTX 3090 Ti 29206
+261%
Samples: 3386

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 290 11860
RTX 3090 Ti 53110
+348%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−73.8%
210
1440p35−40
−75.4%
142
4K27−30
−73.3%
101

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.25
+23.8%
9.52
1440p11.40
+19%
14.08
4K14.78
+25.3%
19.79
  • R9 290 has 24% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R9 290 has 19% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • R9 290 has 25% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 219 219
Resident Evil 4 Remake 210−220 210−220

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 201 201
Far Cry 5 200−210 200−210
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 280−290 280−290
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 173 173
Dota 2 217 217
Far Cry 5 200−210 200−210
Far Cry 6 161 161
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 280−290 280−290
Grand Theft Auto V 170 170
Metro Exodus 178 178
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394 394
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 152 152
Dota 2 195 195
Far Cry 5 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 280−290 280−290
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 193 193
Valorant 400−450 400−450

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 220−230 220−230
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Far Cry 6 133 133
Grand Theft Auto V 151 151
Metro Exodus 125 125
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 104 104
Far Cry 5 180−190 180−190
Forza Horizon 4 240−250 240−250
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190 180−190

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−105 100−105
Far Cry 6 90 90
Grand Theft Auto V 181 181
Metro Exodus 84 84
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173 173
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 100−105 100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 53 53
Dota 2 184 184
Far Cry 5 120−130 120−130
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 200−210
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how R9 290 and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 Ti is 282% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 Ti is 306% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 Ti is 274% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.34 69.81
Recency 5 November 2013 27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 450 Watt

R9 290 has 39% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 Ti, on the other hand, has a 261% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 290 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 628 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3747 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 290 or GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.