GeForce GTX 880M SLI vs Radeon R9 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 285 with GeForce GTX 880M SLI, including specs and performance data.

R9 285
2014, $249
2 GB GDDR5, 190 Watt
15.97

880M SLI outperforms R9 285 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking379323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.77no data
Power efficiency6.557.46
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTongaN15E-GX-A2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 September 2014 (12 years ago)12 March 2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923072
Core clock speed918 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million2x 3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt206 Watt
Texture fill rate102.8no data
Floating-point processing power3.29 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2x 8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2no data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (FL 11_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2.170-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 285 15.97
GTX 880M SLI 19.73
+23.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 285 8570
GTX 880M SLI 11817
+37.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−6074
+34.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.53no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 40−45
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 35−40
Resident Evil 4 Remake 45−50 45−50

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85 80−85
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 40−45
Far Cry 5 65−70 65−70
Fortnite 100−110 100−110
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 80−85
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80
Valorant 140−150 140−150

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85 80−85
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 110−120
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 230−240
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 40−45
Dota 2 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 5 65−70 65−70
Fortnite 100−110 100−110
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 80−85
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 70−75
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 35−40
Metro Exodus 40−45 40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 55−60
Valorant 140−150 140−150

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 40−45
Dota 2 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 5 65−70 65−70
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 80−85
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40 35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 55−60
Valorant 140−150 140−150

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 100−110

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 40−45
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 140−150
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 35−40
Metro Exodus 24−27 24−27
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 170−180 170−180

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 18−20
Far Cry 5 45−50 45−50
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 50−55
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 30−35

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 45−50

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 18−20
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 35−40
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 12−14
Metro Exodus 16−18 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 27−30
Valorant 100−110 100−110

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 30−35
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 8−9
Dota 2 65−70 65−70
Far Cry 5 21−24 21−24
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 35−40
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22 20−22

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 21−24

This is how R9 285 and GTX 880M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 880M SLI is 35% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.97 19.73
Recency 2 September 2014 12 March 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 206 Watt

R9 285 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 8% lower power consumption.

GTX 880M SLI, on the other hand, has a 24% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 880M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 285 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 285 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 880M SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 285 or GeForce GTX 880M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.