Arc Graphics 64EU vs Radeon R9 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.77no data
Power efficiency6.55no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameTongaArrow Lake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 September 2014 (12 years ago)24 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed918 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)190 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate102.860.80
Floating-point processing power3.29 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11232
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length221 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1375 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2Motherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 65 Watt

Arc Graphics 64EU has an age advantage of 10 years, a 89% more advanced lithography process, and 66% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 285 and Arc Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 80 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 285 or Arc Graphics 64EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.