FirePro S7150 x2 vs Radeon R9 280
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 428 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.75 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.13 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Tahiti | Tonga |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Design | reference | no data |
| Release date | 4 March 2014 (12 years ago) | 1 February 2016 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $3,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 1792 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 920 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 933 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,313 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 265 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 104.5 | 103.0 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 3.344 TFLOPS | 3.297 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 275 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 240 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s ×2 |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| CrossFire | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| LiquidVR | + | - |
| TressFX | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| DDMA audio | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.170 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 March 2014 | 1 February 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 265 Watt |
R9 280 has 33% lower power consumption.
S7150 x2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 280 and FirePro S7150 x2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 280 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S7150 x2 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
