Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile vs Radeon R9 255 OEM
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Cape Verde | TU106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 21 December 2013 (12 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 1920 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,500 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 29.76 | 165.6 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.9523 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 120 ×2 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 240 ×2 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 30 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s ×2 |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 December 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 160 Watt |
R9 255 OEM has 146% lower power consumption.
RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
