Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon R9 255 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.72
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 December 2013 (12 years ago)21 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Core clock speed900 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate29.76157.2
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32112
L1 Cache128 KB672 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s168.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2013 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 75 Watt

R9 255 OEM has 15% lower power consumption.

P3200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 255 OEM and Quadro P3200 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 255 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 1070 votes

Rate Radeon R9 255 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 255 OEM or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.