UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon R7 M520

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated935
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameOlandTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed1030 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.60no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M520 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M520 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 24 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 397 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M520 or UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.