A100 SXM4 40 GB vs Radeon R7 M520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameOlandGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (9 years ago)14 May 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206912
Core clock speed1030 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs20432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB40 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 400 Watt

R7 M520 has 700% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 40 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M520 and A100 SXM4 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M520 is a desktop graphics card while A100 SXM4 40 GB is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 24 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M520 or A100 SXM4 40 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.