T600 vs Radeon R7 M365X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M365X with T600, including specs and performance data.

R7 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
2.02

T600 outperforms R7 M365X by a whopping 653% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking948393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.61
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameLithoTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (11 years ago)6 May 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384640
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed900 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors690 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rate23.0453.40
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2440
L1 Cache96 KB640 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 M365X 2.02
T600 15.21
+653%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 M365X 847
Samples: 41
T600 6364
+651%
Samples: 581

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−87%
54
1440p3−4
−87%
23
4K2−320
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 40−45 40−45
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 30−35

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 40−45 40−45
Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 30−35
Far Cry 5 46 46
Fortnite 85−90 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 40−45 40−45
Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 30−35
Dota 2 121 121
Far Cry 5 42 42
Far Cry 6 24 24
Fortnite 85−90 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
Grand Theft Auto V 59 59
Metro Exodus 26 26
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48 48
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 30−35
Dota 2 111 111
Far Cry 5 39 39
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27 27
Valorant 120−130 120−130

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 85−90

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33 30−33
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 110−120
Far Cry 6 24−27 24−27
Grand Theft Auto V 27 27
Metro Exodus 15 15
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 150−160
Valorant 140−150 140−150

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 40−45
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 14−16
Far Cry 5 26 26
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 21−24

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 35−40

4K
High

Atomic Heart 12−14 12−14
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Far Cry 6 7−8 7−8
Grand Theft Auto V 25 25
Metro Exodus 8 8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 16
Valorant 75−80 75−80

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 21−24
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 6−7
Dota 2 40 40
Far Cry 5 12 12
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 14−16

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 14−16

This is how R7 M365X and T600 compete in popular games:

  • T600 is 671% faster in 1080p
  • T600 is 667% faster in 1440p
  • T600 is 900% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 15.21
Recency 5 May 2015 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

T600 has a 653% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M365X is a notebook graphics card while T600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 57 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 708 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M365X or T600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.