Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) and Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 1103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 984 | 301 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.11 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2 (2016) | Xe3 (2026) |
| GPU code name | Bristol Ridge | Panther Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (10 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 12 |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-45 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 14
−357%
| 64
+357%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−1600%
| 34
+1600%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 4−5
−1400%
|
60−65
+1400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−4067%
|
120−130
+4067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1100%
|
45−50
+1100%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 4−5
−1400%
|
60−65
+1400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−2150%
|
90−95
+2150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−4067%
|
120−130
+4067%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1100%
|
45−50
+1100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1725%
|
70−75
+1725%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1300%
|
110−120
+1300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−790%
|
85−90
+790%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−682%
|
85−90
+682%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−300%
|
150−160
+300%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 4−5
−1400%
|
60−65
+1400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−2150%
|
90−95
+2150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−4067%
|
120−130
+4067%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 35−40
−553%
|
240−250
+553%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1100%
|
45−50
+1100%
|
| Dota 2 | 16
−1088%
|
190−200
+1088%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1725%
|
70−75
+1725%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1300%
|
110−120
+1300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−790%
|
85−90
+790%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5
−1320%
|
71
+1320%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−1500%
|
45−50
+1500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−682%
|
85−90
+682%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−700%
|
60−65
+700%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−300%
|
150−160
+300%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
−2150%
|
90−95
+2150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1100%
|
45−50
+1100%
|
| Dota 2 | 14
−1043%
|
160−170
+1043%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1725%
|
70−75
+1725%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−790%
|
85−90
+790%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−682%
|
85−90
+682%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−700%
|
60−65
+700%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1054%
|
450−500
+1054%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
−1300%
|
110−120
+1300%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−1075%
|
45−50
+1075%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−1115%
|
150−160
+1115%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−1067%
|
210−220
+1067%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−1120%
|
180−190
+1120%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2100%
|
21−24
+2100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1300%
|
55−60
+1300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1667%
|
50−55
+1667%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−1100%
|
12−14
+1100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−173%
|
40−45
+173%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−1110%
|
120−130
+1110%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−1050%
|
21−24
+1050%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−700%
|
24−27
+700%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 28
+0%
|
28
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
This is how R7 (Bristol Ridge) and Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:
- Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 357% faster in 1080p
- Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 1600% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 4067% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 46 tests (84%)
- there's a draw in 9 tests (16%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.81 | 21.78 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 5 January 2026 |
Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 1103% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 years.
The Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
