Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 882 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | no data |
| GPU code name | Kaveri Spectre | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 January 2014 (12 years ago) | 31 July 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | no data |
| L2 Cache | no data | 576 KB |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 January 2014 | 31 July 2025 |
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 11 years.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is a desktop graphics card while Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
