Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 7730 HD 7750 HD 7770 HD 8730 OEM HD 8760 OEM R7 250E R7 250X R7 350 R7 350 640SP R7 450 OEM R9 255 OEM RX 540 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Qualcomm Adreno X2-85 Qualcomm Adreno X2-90

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with Qualcomm Adreno X2-90, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.20

Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 350 R7 350
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 Adreno X2-90

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking682343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.31no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameCape Verdeno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 July 2016 (10 years ago)29 September 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed800 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1850 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate25.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1125 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−300%
56
+300%
1440p10−12
−260%
36
+260%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
+0%
54
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Palworld 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how R7 350 and Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 compete in popular games:

  • Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is 260% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.20 18.22
Recency 6 July 2016 29 September 2025

Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 has a 250% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 years.

The Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 Adreno X2 90
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI HD 5870 Radeon HD 5870
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
Tegra 4 GPU 4 GPU
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
PG506-242 PG506 242
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
L40S L40S
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
RTX 4060 AD106 RTX 4060 AD106
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
R7 M270DX R7 M270DX
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
Mystique G200
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 599 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or Qualcomm Adreno X2-90, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.