GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs Radeon R7 240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 240 with GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 240
2013, $69
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.14

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms R7 240 by a whopping 1834% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking935112
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Power efficiency5.5528.02
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameOlandAD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203072
Core clock speedno data1545 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1890 MHz
Number of transistors950 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate14.00181.4
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPS11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2096
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache80 KB3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R7 240 2.14
RTX 4060 Mobile 41.39
+1834%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 240 897
Samples: 3958
RTX 4060 Mobile 17315
+1830%
Samples: 23728

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 240 1220
RTX 4060 Mobile 26530
+2075%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−95.5%
112
1440p3−461
+1933%
4K1−238
+3700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.80no data
1440p23.00no data
4K69.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 195 195
Cyberpunk 2077 123 123
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 124

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 195 195
Cyberpunk 2077 99 99
Far Cry 5 128 128
Fortnite 180−190 180−190
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 160−170
Valorant 240−250 240−250

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 146 146
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 84 84
Dota 2 164 164
Far Cry 5 129 129
Far Cry 6 69 69
Fortnite 180−190 180−190
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 160−170
Grand Theft Auto V 141 141
Metro Exodus 25 25
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191 191
Valorant 240−250 240−250

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 77 77
Dota 2 156 156
Far Cry 5 125 125
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101 101
Valorant 240−250 240−250

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190 180−190

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 98 98
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300 290−300
Far Cry 6 79 79
Grand Theft Auto V 85 85
Metro Exodus 59 59
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 280−290 280−290

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 100−110
Cyberpunk 2077 49 49
Far Cry 5 98 98
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 120−130
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76 76

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 39 39
Far Cry 6 6 6
Grand Theft Auto V 76 76
Metro Exodus 37 37
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55 55
Valorant 250−260 250−260

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 65−70
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 50−55
Cyberpunk 2077 19 19
Dota 2 126 126
Far Cry 5 40 40
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 80−85
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65 60−65

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 55−60

This is how R7 240 and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 2140% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 1933% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 3700% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 41.39
Recency 8 October 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 115 Watt

R7 240 has 57% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1834% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 82% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 240 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1406 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5054 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 240 or GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.