UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1282 | 837 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.88 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Mullins | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (12 years ago) | 28 May 2019 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 12-25 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR4 |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−550%
| 13
+550%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−800%
| 9
+800%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−66.7%
|
45−50
+66.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−66.7%
|
30
+66.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−100%
|
22
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 2 |
| Palworld | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−66.7%
|
45−50
+66.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−81.8%
|
20
+81.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−250%
|
14−16
+250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+20%
|
5
−20%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−66.7%
|
45−50
+66.7%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Palworld | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−333%
|
24−27
+333%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| Palworld | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 8
+0%
|
8
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4
+0%
|
4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how R6 (Mullins) and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 550% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 800% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R6 (Mullins) is 20% faster.
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R6 (Mullins) performs better in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) performs better in 30 tests (58%)
- there's a draw in 21 tests (40%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.59 | 2.87 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 28 May 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 386% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
