Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Radeon R5 M435
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 M435 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms R5 M435 by a whopping 516% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 946 | 446 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Jet | Panther Lake |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 May 2016 (10 years ago) | 5 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 2450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 690 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6592 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | no data |
| TMUs | 20 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 5−6
−83.9%
| 31 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 79 | 79 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 59 | 59 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| Fortnite | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Valorant | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27 | 27 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| Fortnite | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 36 | 36 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Metro Exodus | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 48 | 48 |
| Valorant | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24 | 24 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80 | 75−80 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| Metro Exodus | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Valorant | 120−130 | 120−130 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20 | 18−20 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| Metro Exodus | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Valorant | 60−65 | 60−65 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14 | 12−14 |
This is how R5 M435 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 520% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.08 | 12.82 |
| Recency | 15 May 2016 | 5 January 2026 |
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 516% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 years.
The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M435 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
