ATI VGA Wonder XL24 vs Radeon R5 M240
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1121 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Wonder (1990−1992) |
| GPU code name | Jet | 28800-6 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 September 2014 (11 years ago) | 16 March 1992 (34 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 10 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 690 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 800 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6592 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 1 |
| TMUs | 20 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | Not Listed | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCI |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | Not Listed | DRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 0 MB | 1 MB |
| Memory bus width | Not Listed | 32 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 10 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 40 MB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| AppAcceleration | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | N/A |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | N/A |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2014 | 16 March 1992 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 800 nm |
R5 M240 has an age advantage of 22 years, and a 2757% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 and VGA Wonder XL24. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while VGA Wonder XL24 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
