UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated841
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Power efficiencyno data14.74
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameWaniComet Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 September 2017 (8 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384184
Core clock speed200 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6026.45
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs2423

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1701.1.103

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2017 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 630 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and UHD Graphics 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1833 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 4844 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or UHD Graphics 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.