T400 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.37
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameWaniTU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2017 (8 years ago)6 May 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed200 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6034.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2424
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2017 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

R5 Graphics has 100% lower power consumption.

T400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and T400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while T400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1833 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 413 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.