GeForce Go 6800 Ultra vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.29
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameWaniNV41
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 September 2017 (9 years ago)24 February 2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38417
Core clock speed200 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million190 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt89 Watt
Texture fill rate21.605.400
ROPs88
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2017 24 February 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 89 Watt

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 12 years, a 78% more advanced lithography process, and 83% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and GeForce Go 6800 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1833 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or GeForce Go 6800 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.