GeForce 6200 vs Radeon R5 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameWaniNV43
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 September 2017 (8 years ago)11 October 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$39.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,200 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.601.200
ROPs82
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data190 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2017 11 October 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

R5 Graphics has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Graphics and GeForce 6200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1833 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 88 votes

Rate GeForce 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Graphics or GeForce 6200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.