ATI Radeon 7500 vs R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) with Radeon 7500, including specs and performance data.
R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms 7500 by a whopping 22200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 928 | 1608 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.86 | 0.03 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | Bristol Ridge | RV200 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (10 years ago) | 14 August 2001 (25 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Core clock speed | no data | 290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 60 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-45 Watt | 23 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1.740 |
| ROPs | no data | 2 |
| TMUs | no data | 6 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | AGP 4x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 230 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 7.36 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 9 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 11 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 18 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 6 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 17 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 6 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 20−22 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 6 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.23 | 0.01 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 14 August 2001 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 23 Watt |
R5 (Bristol Ridge) has a 22200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 81% more advanced lithography process, and 48% lower power consumption.
The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 7500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7500 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
