RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon R5 A240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 8570 OEM R5 240 OEM R5 340 OEM R5 340X OEM R5 430 OEM R7 240 R7 240 OEM R7 250 R7 340 OEM R7 350 OEM R7 350X OEM R7 430 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 A240 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R5 A240
2014
2 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
1.38
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025
8 GB GDDR7, 45 Watt
36.17
+2521%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms R5 A240 by a whopping 2521% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R5 A240 R5 A240
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1061154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.1462.18
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameOlandGB206
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2014 (12 years ago)19 March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203328
Core clock speed1030 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors950 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60172.3
Floating-point processing powerno data11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs20104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cacheno data3.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MBps1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)3.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−3025%
125
+3025%
1440p2−3
−3400%
70
+3400%
4K3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Palworld 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Palworld 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how R5 A240 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 3025% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 3400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 2600% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.38 36.17
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has a 2521% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 11% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 A240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R5 A240 Radeon R5 A240
vs
ATI E4690 Radeon E4690
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
R5 A240 Radeon R5 A240
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
R5 A240 AMD R5 A240
vs
RX 5500 OEM 5500 OEM
R5 A240 AMD R5 A240
vs
RTX 2070 Super Mobile 2070 Super Mobile
R5 A240 AMD R5 A240
vs
R9 M290X Mac Edition M290X Mac Edition
R5 A240 AMD R5 A240
vs
Instinct MI300 MI300
R5 A240 AMD R5 A240
vs
HD Graphics 6EU 6EU
R5 A240 AMD R5 A240
vs
Jetson T4000 T4000
R5 A240 AMD R5 A240
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Embedded
Pro V7300X AMD Pro V7300X
vs
R5 M250 M250
Pro V7300X AMD Pro V7300X
vs
Radeon 625 625
Pro V7300X AMD Pro V7300X
vs
UHD Graphics P750 P750

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 19 votes

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 A240 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.