Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs Radeon R5 240 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameOlandG80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)5 March 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed730 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt154 Watt
Texture fill rate18.7224.00
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS0.2304 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs2424
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB768 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s67.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 5 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 768 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 154 Watt

R5 240 OEM has an age advantage of 6 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221% more advanced lithography process, and 208% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 240 OEM and Quadro FX 4600 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 240 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 4600 SDI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 615 votes

Rate Radeon R5 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 240 OEM or Quadro FX 4600 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.