FirePro W5000 DVI vs Radeon R5 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1319not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCaicosPitcairn
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (12 years ago)25 February 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160768
Core clock speedno data825 MHz
Number of transistors370 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate5.00039.60
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs848
L1 Cache16 KB192 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm191 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / half length
Supplementary power connectorsN/ANone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2014 25 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 75 Watt

R5 230 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 295% lower power consumption.

W5000 DVI, on the other hand, has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 230 and FirePro W5000 DVI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro W5000 DVI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 279 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate FirePro W5000 DVI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or FirePro W5000 DVI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.