Riva 128 PCI vs Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1186not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)no data
GPU code nameStoney RidgeNV3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (10 years ago)1 April 1997 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speedno data100 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors3100 Million4 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.1
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data4 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)5.0
OpenGLno data1.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 1 April 1997
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128 PCI, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) and Riva 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Riva 128 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 12 votes

Rate Riva 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) or Riva 128 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.