Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

Place in the ranking	337	772
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.22	0.18
Power efficiency	11.00	5.76
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	GK107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 November 2016 (9 years ago)	1 March 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Pro WX 7100 has 1689% better value for money than Quadro K2000.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	384
Core clock speed	1188 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	1243 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	51 Watt
Texture fill rate	179.0	30.53
Floating-point processing power	5.728 TFLOPS	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	144	32
L1 Cache	576 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	241 mm	202 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	-	3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 7100 18.49
+387%

Quadro K2000 3.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7702
+386%

Samples: 451

Quadro K2000 1584
Samples: 1937

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro WX 7100 39942
+920%

Quadro K2000 3916

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +405%	21−24 −405%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Palworld	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	40−45 +425%	8−9 −425%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	75−80 +388%	16−18 −388%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +405%	21−24 −405%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +417%	12−14 −417%
Fortnite	100−105 +456%	18−20 −456%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +450%	14−16 −450%
Palworld	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +407%	14−16 −407%
Valorant	140−150 +426%	27−30 −426%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	75−80 +388%	16−18 −388%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +405%	21−24 −405%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	220−230 +407%	45−50 −407%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Dota 2	100−110 +414%	21−24 −414%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +417%	12−14 −417%
Fortnite	100−105 +456%	18−20 −456%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +450%	14−16 −450%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Palworld	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +407%	14−16 −407%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +420%	10−11 −420%
Valorant	140−150 +426%	27−30 −426%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	75−80 +388%	16−18 −388%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Dota 2	100−110 +414%	21−24 −414%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +417%	12−14 −417%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +450%	14−16 −450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +407%	14−16 −407%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +420%	10−11 −420%
Valorant	140−150 +426%	27−30 −426%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	100−105 +456%	18−20 −456%
Palworld	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +443%	7−8 −443%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	130−140 +404%	27−30 −404%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +433%	6−7 −433%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +457%	30−33 −457%
Valorant	160−170 +453%	30−33 −453%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	50−55 +430%	10−11 −430%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +425%	8−9 −425%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +422%	9−10 −422%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +460%	5−6 −460%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	40−45 +438%	8−9 −438%
Palworld	24−27 +420%	5−6 −420%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +467%	6−7 −467%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Palworld	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Valorant	95−100 +444%	18−20 −444%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	27−30 +460%	5−6 −460%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Dota 2	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +450%	6−7 −450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Palworld	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.49	3.80
Recency	10 November 2016	1 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	51 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 387% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K2000, on the other hand, has 155% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh

Radeon RX 550 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 63 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.5 263 votes

Rate Quadro K2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Quadro K2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.