ATI All-In-Wonder X1900 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.65no data
Power efficiency13.66no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameEllesmereR580
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 November 2016 (9 years ago)13 January 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed713 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1086 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate121.68.000
Floating-point processing power3.892 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs11216
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz477 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s30.53 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 November 2016 13 January 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm

Pro WX 5100 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 5100 and All-In-Wonder X1900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder X1900 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 106 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder X1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 5100 or All-In-Wonder X1900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.