Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro V5300X Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4200 Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 9200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016, $399
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
8.87

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms Pro 4100 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541507
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.49no data
Power efficiency13.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameBaffinMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244
Core clock speed1125 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate76.86no data
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs64no data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−19%
25
+19%

Cost per frame, $

1080p19.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 22
+0%
22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30
+0%
Palworld 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4100 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 19% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.87 9.64
Recency 10 November 2016 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
T400 T400
GT 1030 GT 1030
vs
HD 8570 OEM Rebrand HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
GT 1030 GT 1030
vs
9500 GT Rev. 2 9500 GT Rev. 2
GT 1030 GT 1030
vs
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 5100
vs
Xe DG1 Xe DG1
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
vs
Radeon 530 530
FirePro W4300 W4300
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
FirePro W4300 W4300
vs
Quadro P2200 P2200
FirePro S9170 S9170
vs
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
FirePro W8100 W8100
vs
ATI Rage 128 VR Rage 128 VR
FirePro D300 D300
vs
Radeon 625 625

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 63 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 49 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.