GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016, $399
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
8.87

RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms Pro 4100 by a whopping 570% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54044
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.49no data
Power efficiency13.7241.77
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBaffinAD104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247424
Core clock speed1125 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate76.86386.3
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs64232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cache256 KB7.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 4100 8.87
RTX 4080 Mobile 59.40
+570%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3697
Samples: 273
RTX 4080 Mobile 24748
+569%
Samples: 4005

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−605%
148
+605%
1440p14−16
−593%
97
+593%
4K9−10
−622%
65
+622%

Cost per frame, $

1080p19.00no data
1440p28.50no data
4K44.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 149
+0%
149
+0%
Palworld 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+0%
215
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
+0%
143
+0%
Far Cry 5 171
+0%
171
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Palworld 162
+0%
162
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 196
+0%
196
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Dota 2 178
+0%
178
+0%
Far Cry 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 157
+0%
157
+0%
Metro Exodus 146
+0%
146
+0%
Palworld 134
+0%
134
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 334
+0%
334
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+0%
121
+0%
Dota 2 165
+0%
165
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 172
+0%
172
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Palworld 131
+0%
131
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 149
+0%
149
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 122
+0%
122
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+0%
140
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 107
+0%
107
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 144
+0%
144
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
Palworld 83
+0%
83
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%
Valorant 336
+0%
336
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 157
+0%
157
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 61
+0%
61
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4100 and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 605% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 593% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 622% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.87 59.40
Recency 10 November 2016 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 110 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has 120% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 570% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 63 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 963 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.