Arc G3 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.49no data
Power efficiency13.72no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameBaffinPanther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (9 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241280
Core clock speed1125 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8696.00
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs6440
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cache256 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2016 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

Arc G3 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Arc G3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Arc G3 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 63 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc G3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or Arc G3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.