RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking675not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.52no data
Power efficiency6.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 23AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 July 2019 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6405120
Core clock speed1082 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate34.62360.0
Floating-point processing power1.385 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache160 KB5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthMXM ModuleIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 54% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 112 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 3200 or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.