N1 16SM vs Radeon Pro W6900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking106not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.37no data
Power efficiency10.78no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 21GB20B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 August 2021 (5 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202048
Core clock speed1825 MHz741 MHz
Boost clock speed2150 MHz2346 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate688.0300.3
Floating-point processing power22.02 TFLOPS9.609 TFLOPS
ROPs12824
TMUs320128
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Cores8016
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB2 MB
L2 Cache4 MB50 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB128 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s273.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt1x HDMI
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA-12.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2021 1 June 2026
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

N1 16SM has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6900X and N1 16SM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6900X is a workstation graphics card while N1 16SM is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate N1 16SM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6900X or N1 16SM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.