Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.15no data
Power efficiency14.98no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 21Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840512
Core clock speed2075 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2320 MHz1750 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate556.856.00
Floating-point processing power17.82 TFLOPS1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs24032
Ray Tracing Cores60no data
L0 Cache960 KBno data
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 65 Watt

Pro W6800 has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 285% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800 and Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 24 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6800 or Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.