ATI FireGL V7350 vs Radeon Pro W6600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking201not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.77no data
Power efficiency20.29no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 23R520
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date3 August 2021 (5 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed2068 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed2479 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,060 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate317.39.600
Floating-point processing power10.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6416
TMUs12816
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 August 2021 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 111 Watt

Pro W6600X has an age advantage of 15 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7350, on the other hand, has 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6600X and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro W6600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600X or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.