Rubin Ultra GPU vs Radeon Pro W6400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking315not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.13no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameNavi 24GR110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 January 2022 (4 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76857344
Core clock speed2331 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed2331 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate111.94,062.5
Floating-point processing power3.58 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs481792
Tensor Coresno data1792
Ray Tracing Cores12no data
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB112 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 6.0 x16
Width1-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.6N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 3600 Watt

Pro W6400 has 7100% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6400 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 33 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6400 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.