RTX A4000H vs Radeon Pro W6300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.26
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNavi 24GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 January 2022 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686144
Core clock speed1512 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate97.92299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores1248
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KB6 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 140 Watt

Pro W6300M has an age advantage of 9 months, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 460% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000H, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6300M and RTX A4000H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX A4000H is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A4000H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6300M or RTX A4000H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.