Arc G3 vs Radeon Pro W5700X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking151not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.93no data
Power efficiency13.75no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameNavi 10Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 December 2019 (6 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041280
Core clock speed1243 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2040 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate293.896.00
Floating-point processing power9.4 TFLOPS6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs14440
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cache4 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length305 mmno data
WidthQuad-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 4x ThunderboltPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2019 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 25 Watt

Arc G3 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 720% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700X and Arc G3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700X is a workstation graphics card while Arc G3 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 16 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc G3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700X or Arc G3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.