GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.09no data
Power efficiency12.80no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)G7x (2005−2006)
GPU code nameNavi 10G71M
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 November 2019 (6 years ago)1 June 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230454
Core clock speed1243 MHz14 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million556 Million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate277.9no data
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length305 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)GDDR3
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2019 1 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 40 Watt

Pro W5700 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

Go 7900 GS SLI, on the other hand, has 413% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700 and GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 124 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.