ATI FireGL V7600 vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.10no data
Power efficiency12.80no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10R600
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date19 November 2019 (6 years ago)6 November 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304240
Core clock speed1243 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1930 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt127 Watt
Texture fill rate277.97.200
Floating-point processing power8.893 TFLOPS0.288 TFLOPS
ROPs6412
TMUs14412
L2 Cache4 MB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length305 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2019 6 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 127 Watt

Pro W5700 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1043% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7600, on the other hand, has 61% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700 and FireGL V7600. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 124 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FireGL V7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or FireGL V7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.