Arc G3 Extreme vs Radeon Pro W5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking173not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.88no data
Power efficiency12.82no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameNavi 10Panther Lake
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date19 November 2019 (6 years ago)1 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041536
Core clock speed1400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1880 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate270.7120.0
Floating-point processing powerno data7.68 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs14448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2019 1 June 2026
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 80 Watt

Arc G3 Extreme has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 156% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W5700 and Arc G3 Extreme. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W5700 is a workstation graphics card while Arc G3 Extreme is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 124 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Arc G3 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5700 or Arc G3 Extreme, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.